Most persons are ‘stuck’ in old thinking, theories, patterns. It’s necessary to strongly beware time-waste due to factual omissions that would allow quicker dismissal of previously (expensively) discounted considerations.
I rewatched and rewrote analysis of this video — Decades ago DAVIDOVITZ proposed geopolymer as the method — poured-in-place liquified stone. He reverse-engineered the precise chemistry and methods and built an human-scale prototype; therefore, to keep on about “mystery” in construction clouds instead of clarifies.
Moreover, rehash and consideration of old, already discounted theories already strongly dismissed as unlikely is admirable for thoroughness but time-wasting. For example, discussion and reconsideration of any “external ramps” would be obviated quickly if the old factual dismissals were introduced promptly, in this case, the fact that external ramps would likely comprise more material than the pyramid itself completely obviates any use (or value in the reconsideration) of external ramps at all.
There are other omissions, too, which mislead into time-waste. One example is the reconsideration of the “air shafts” into the “kings” and “queens” chambers without prompt statement of the fact that these shafts were not originally fully opened/connected into the chambers but had to have ‘completion holes’ cut, hewn or blasted through stones in the walls of the chambers. Meanwhile, any liquids in those originally sealed-at-bottom shafts would have acted far, far more like cooling shafts or perhaps piezo-electric vibrational damping shafts, rather than air supply / ventilation shafts (which they clearly were not). But, alas, these basic facts are omitted and thus toss hapless viewers back decades and countless man-years of discovery and reasoning.
In these ways, perhaps honestly or maybe perniciously, this video causes in some vital ways overall more setback than advancement, in this viewer’s opinion. LAND OF CHEM youtuber analysis of all pyramids as industrial-scale chemical processing machines accounts immediately makes more practical sense without disregard of or conflicts amongst evidence.
Do you not admit that your point of view may be wrong? A long time ago I studied at one of the best math schools in Russia. Do you know what I understood there? In any situation, there may be people much smarter than you. The main blocks of which the pyramid is built are natural limestone. Shells are visible in them. They could not have been preserved when creating geopolymer. The question of the casing remains open. But the strangest thing is that you do not understand a simple fact. Creating 5 million tons of geopolymer is much more difficult than building a pyramid of blocks. The idea of paid comments is very funny!
@GreatPyramidsEquation You’re right. Adjusted. “The idea of paid comments” — such is common. It seems irrelevant if shells had been left in the source limestone crush; why bother picking any out, as doing so is unecessary chemically and adds to the desired overall aggregate. Also: “Creating 5 million tons of geopolymer is much more difficult than building a pyramid of blocks” is arguable when the mammoth obstacle of moving and making-in-place the many masonry monsters is manageable and immediately pracitcal if accomplished in liquid / geopolymer manner but at best unweildy (perhaps even for veritiable “giants”) if not impossible in all to-date block/solid theoretical schemes.
